my RR result

Automotive topics & discussion.
robmarriott
CB-Uk Newbie
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 4:01 pm

my RR result

Post by robmarriott »

right

took the car to Jamsport for a checkover and RR run

results are here:

Image

just for the few that suffer from not being able to read, figures are

130bhp @6733rpm and
123lb/ft @4533rpm

thanks to the lads at Jamsport for fitting me in at short notice, and broster for scanning the pic and coming with me

opinions please :thumbs:
User avatar
Adam-D
Administrator
Posts: 1398
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 11:03 pm
Location: cheshire
Contact:

my RR result

Post by Adam-D »

nice one.
not a bad figure
Joff
CB-Uk User
Posts: 1367
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 7:29 pm
Location: Peterborough

my RR result

Post by Joff »

Quite healthy that :)
No more Corsa :(
robmarriott
CB-Uk Newbie
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 4:01 pm

my RR result

Post by robmarriott »

yep, i\'m happy with it

better than the 105bhp the first run gave :o

did 4 runs, 105bhp lol, 127bhp, 128 and 130
corsacant
CB-Uk User
Posts: 124
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 9:49 pm
Location: Hull

my RR result

Post by corsacant »

What engine mods have you done?
broster
CB-Uk User
Posts: 437
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 7:49 pm
Location: jamsport
Contact:

my RR result

Post by broster »

lexmaul inlet
janspeed 4-2-1
viper
bfo system with decat
ecu mapped for my old engine which was pretty identicle (by chipwizards)

oh its a 1.6 16v
corsacant
CB-Uk User
Posts: 124
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 9:49 pm
Location: Hull

my RR result

Post by corsacant »

Shouldn\'t the power output be a tad higher then?
punkheadgray
CB-Uk User
Posts: 1684
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 8:23 pm
Location: Essex

my RR result

Post by punkheadgray »

seems like quite a good reading to me, nice one dude :thumbs:
Stuart_SRI
CB-Uk User
Posts: 996
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 3:56 pm
Location: London

my RR result

Post by Stuart_SRI »

id be pleased with that
broster
CB-Uk User
Posts: 437
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 7:49 pm
Location: jamsport
Contact:

my RR result

Post by broster »

[quote=\"corsacant\"]Shouldn\'t the power output be a tad higher then?[/quote]

no, people often think because an engine has mods it should have 5bhp for viper 10bhp for chip 10bhp for lexmaul etc etc! it wont work like that 130bhp is very very good power for the mods done!
wayne the wheel
CB-Uk User
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 8:14 pm

my RR result

Post by wayne the wheel »

i have a 1.6 16v aswell mate it has been chipped but it was done b 4 i got the car it will rev round to 7500rpm does yours do the same??
broster
CB-Uk User
Posts: 437
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 7:49 pm
Location: jamsport
Contact:

my RR result

Post by broster »

[quote=\"wayne the wheel\"]i have a 1.6 16v aswell mate it has been chipped but it was done b 4 i got the car it will rev round to 7500rpm does yours do the same??[/quote]

what chip was fitted, robins revs to 7500 because it was mapped not chipped.
wayne the wheel
CB-Uk User
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 8:14 pm

my RR result

Post by wayne the wheel »

oh right not sure as it was done when i got it could do with finding out realy the guy said it was chipped and remapped
j1400
CB-Uk User
Posts: 277
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Hemel Hempstead

my RR result

Post by j1400 »

Just noticed one thing, the shape looks good, but the torwue bhp crossover is in the worng place should sit at 5250rpm (due to the calculation of BHP from torque, so assumign that peak power and torqur are high :s
robmarriott
CB-Uk Newbie
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 4:01 pm

my RR result

Post by robmarriott »

no james, the peak torque and power are the same amount at 5252rpm

the crossover point depends on the scales used
Post Reply