Page 1 of 1
Induction kit > standard air filter ?
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 8:54 pm
by Wonderboy
So what do you guys think. Is an induction kit better than a standard air filter ?
Those of you who have had or have an induction kit, do you notice any performance boots from it ? Is the cost of an induction kit (even though they are fairly cheap) and the additional petrol usage, worth the performance boost ?
And would you recomend them on a 1l
? Would i see any performance boost ?
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:05 pm
by kaz
go for a ram air panel filter and drill the air box
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 10:51 pm
by Octane2097
mines got a k&n induction kit on
sounds nice but dosnt really give any performance increase
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 4:02 am
by Matt@LeedsCruize
to be honest i had a pipercross on mine, it sounded nice, but used more petrol, and no it wasnt me just being more heavy footed lol.
gave got standard box on now, may drill the box and put panel in
anyone recommend which ones are the best panel filters for the job?
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 8:19 pm
by Matt@LeedsCruize
. wrote:
pipercross or ramair
reason you were using more fuel was because it upped your performance a bit nd also even though you say it wasn't due to your lead foot, you probably liked the sound more so booted it a bit harder to hear it roar more.
i know that and i tel that to other people, but i dont need to put my foot down, i have a nice exhaust
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 12:03 am
by Adam-D
i would go with de-restricting the std airbox, fit a panel filter.
Re: Induction kit > standard air filter ?
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 3:18 pm
by muppetsport
id just leave it as it is really.